<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More value lies in conversation than in repetition. @replies yes, RT&#039;s no.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/social-media/twitter-replies-retweets-and-value-in-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/social-media/twitter-replies-retweets-and-value-in-conversation/</link>
	<description>Web Design Cork</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:17:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Scanlon</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/social-media/twitter-replies-retweets-and-value-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Scanlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=257#comment-461</guid>
		<description>I hear ya. RTs are also useful if you&#039;re dipping in and out of Twiiter and might miss the original tweet. Also if certain people RT something then i know that is gonna be a good read, as opposed to some people who just RT everything they read.

&quot;The problem is that retweets are now seen as currency, &quot; That&#039;s certainly true especially with websites like retweetrank.com out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear ya. RTs are also useful if you&#8217;re dipping in and out of Twiiter and might miss the original tweet. Also if certain people RT something then i know that is gonna be a good read, as opposed to some people who just RT everything they read.</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem is that retweets are now seen as currency, &#8221; That&#8217;s certainly true especially with websites like retweetrank.com out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Prendergast</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/social-media/twitter-replies-retweets-and-value-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Prendergast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=257#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Hey Joe, I&#039;ve had all @replies as my setting since I started using Twitter, I don&#039;t mind the extra noise, because at least it&#039;s real conversation.

While using a third party tool to filter is certainly an option to reduce noise, I like to use the web interface for Twitter unless I&#039;m on my ipod touch, and I imagine as Twitter becomes more and more mainstream most new users will be web interface as well.

Also, filtering the RT&#039;s means you lose them, whereas guiding people to @replies over RT&#039;s adds value without losing anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe, I&#8217;ve had all @replies as my setting since I started using Twitter, I don&#8217;t mind the extra noise, because at least it&#8217;s real conversation.</p>
<p>While using a third party tool to filter is certainly an option to reduce noise, I like to use the web interface for Twitter unless I&#8217;m on my ipod touch, and I imagine as Twitter becomes more and more mainstream most new users will be web interface as well.</p>
<p>Also, filtering the RT&#8217;s means you lose them, whereas guiding people to @replies over RT&#8217;s adds value without losing anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Scanlon</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/social-media/twitter-replies-retweets-and-value-in-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Scanlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=257#comment-459</guid>
		<description>You could remove the RT noise by using Tweetdeck and putting on an RT filter. As for all @ replies I tried it for a while but found it very noisy. My 2 cents would be to keep an eye on your favourite Tweeters and add some of the people they talk to a lot and take it from there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could remove the RT noise by using Tweetdeck and putting on an RT filter. As for all @ replies I tried it for a while but found it very noisy. My 2 cents would be to keep an eye on your favourite Tweeters and add some of the people they talk to a lot and take it from there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
