<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Size: Google&#039;s browser &#039;fold&#039; tool.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/conversion-optimisation/browser-size-googles-browser-fold-tool-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/conversion-optimisation/browser-size-googles-browser-fold-tool-test/</link>
	<description>Web Design Cork</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:17:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Prendergast</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/conversion-optimisation/browser-size-googles-browser-fold-tool-test/comment-page-1/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Prendergast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=471#comment-526</guid>
		<description>Hey Leon,
These stats are not the screen resolution but the viewport size - in other words they are the stats for the actual visible area when you take into account the fact that the browser may not be maximised, the browser chrome, any toolbars that might be open and so on.

For example, anything within 750px wide and 350px deep will be seen by 98% of people upon landing on the page.

Anything within 960px wide and 500px deep will be seen by 90% of people upon landing on the page.

For more info have a read of my &lt;a href=&quot;http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/web-design/website-design-what-width&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog post on website widths&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Leon,<br />
These stats are not the screen resolution but the viewport size &#8211; in other words they are the stats for the actual visible area when you take into account the fact that the browser may not be maximised, the browser chrome, any toolbars that might be open and so on.</p>
<p>For example, anything within 750px wide and 350px deep will be seen by 98% of people upon landing on the page.</p>
<p>Anything within 960px wide and 500px deep will be seen by 90% of people upon landing on the page.</p>
<p>For more info have a read of my <a href="http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/web-design/website-design-what-width" rel="nofollow">blog post on website widths</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Prendergast</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/conversion-optimisation/browser-size-googles-browser-fold-tool-test/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Prendergast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=471#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Agree that more work is needed, and that the centered site thing is an issue, still though, assuming that you&#039;re looking at the viewport sizes from top left, if you resize your window so your site is aligned top left your getting a good picture of the visibility.

They do say themselves on the about page:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Browser Size works best on web pages with a fixed layout aligned to the left. If the content reflows as the width is adjusted or it is centered, then the results can be misleading. In this case, you can obtain more accurate results by reducing the browser width to a percentage column, e.g. 90% and seeing what content falls below the 90% horizontal line.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that more work is needed, and that the centered site thing is an issue, still though, assuming that you&#8217;re looking at the viewport sizes from top left, if you resize your window so your site is aligned top left your getting a good picture of the visibility.</p>
<p>They do say themselves on the about page:</p>
<blockquote><p>Browser Size works best on web pages with a fixed layout aligned to the left. If the content reflows as the width is adjusted or it is centered, then the results can be misleading. In this case, you can obtain more accurate results by reducing the browser width to a percentage column, e.g. 90% and seeing what content falls below the 90% horizontal line.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/conversion-optimisation/browser-size-googles-browser-fold-tool-test/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=471#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I see what you mean now, oops!

However, I still can&#039;t get my head around the fact that it says 99% of people have a viewport of less then 600 x 350!? And the 1024 x 768 minimum most of us design too only has 60%? Or am I wrong again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you mean now, oops!</p>
<p>However, I still can&#8217;t get my head around the fact that it says 99% of people have a viewport of less then 600 x 350!? And the 1024 x 768 minimum most of us design too only has 60%? Or am I wrong again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Blackbourn</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/conversion-optimisation/browser-size-googles-browser-fold-tool-test/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>John Blackbourn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=471#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Looks like it&#039;s pretty flawed. Load up a site in the viewer and then resize your browser window.

The overlay positions are fixed to the left hand side of the viewport which is fine for left-aligned websites, but it completely fails for centre-aligned sites as the positioning of the site underneath is dependant on your current browser window size.

Nice to see, but definitely needs some work if it&#039;s actually going to be useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it&#8217;s pretty flawed. Load up a site in the viewer and then resize your browser window.</p>
<p>The overlay positions are fixed to the left hand side of the viewport which is fine for left-aligned websites, but it completely fails for centre-aligned sites as the positioning of the site underneath is dependant on your current browser window size.</p>
<p>Nice to see, but definitely needs some work if it&#8217;s actually going to be useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Prendergast</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/conversion-optimisation/browser-size-googles-browser-fold-tool-test/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Prendergast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=471#comment-522</guid>
		<description>The stats are showing the viewport size of a portion of Google&#039;s visitors.

That users scroll is not in contention, therefore it&#039;s not a matter of people &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; seeing content further down the page, but rather a matter of what do they see when they first land on the page.

That said, as I mention in the post, the absolute ideal would be to have stats for your own site, industry benchmarking and overall stats as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stats are showing the viewport size of a portion of Google&#8217;s visitors.</p>
<p>That users scroll is not in contention, therefore it&#8217;s not a matter of people <strong>not</strong> seeing content further down the page, but rather a matter of what do they see when they first land on the page.</p>
<p>That said, as I mention in the post, the absolute ideal would be to have stats for your own site, industry benchmarking and overall stats as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/conversion-optimisation/browser-size-googles-browser-fold-tool-test/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitedesigncork.com/blog/?p=471#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Yeh, its useful alright but not sure about the stats. If its all based on Google.com visits and there&#039;s no scrolling anyway on Google.com as we know, then is it reliable or correct information!?

I mean if my 1 page, loads of scrolling required site was Google then I&#039;m sure there would be higher percentages down the bottom..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh, its useful alright but not sure about the stats. If its all based on Google.com visits and there&#8217;s no scrolling anyway on Google.com as we know, then is it reliable or correct information!?</p>
<p>I mean if my 1 page, loads of scrolling required site was Google then I&#8217;m sure there would be higher percentages down the bottom..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
